NewGen

NewGen

Innovation

Management

M

I

NewGen

NewGen

Innovation

Management

M

I

"Most would say business innovation is of paramount strategic importance. Yet very few acquire the skillset to achieve it."

"We need to work on the root-causes, not the symptoms of ineffective innovation management."

"Most would say business innovation is of paramount strategic importance. Yet very few acquire the skillset to achieve it."

"We need to work on the root-causes, not the symptoms of ineffective innovation management."

>> read here why a new generation of innovation management must emerge.
BLOG
WHAT ARE COMMON CHALLENGES
WHEN INNOVATING NEW ADDED VALUES?
Here a glimpse into symptoms I've encountered over the years building innovation management systems in companies. Like always, only when understanding and working on the underlying root-causes there is a chance to do things better.
February 20, 2026

Resources for Innovation

Innovating business is often communicated as strategically important. The actual allocation of resources, however, speaks a different language.

Read more
February 11, 2026

Innovate, But Not Too Seriously

Being impatient and conducting innovation projects is good. If we have the strong drive to put new solutions to the market as soon as possible.

Read more
February 5, 2026

The Innovation Theater

Showing best intentions to innovate while not allocating resources adequately is a way that is seen quite often.

Read more

Consequent Behaviour

One of the hardest behavioural changes towards effective innovation work is acting consequently. We can set ambitious objectives, communicate processes, stage gates and tools, onboard and train people. But it all won`t help if we don`t consequently change certain aspects in our own behaviour.

Focusing Innovation Work

Being impatient and conducting innovation projects is good. If direction and scope are clear. If not, innovation projects may lead to exactly the opposite what we want.

Defining What Innovation Is

We all speak about innovation. But do we all mean the same?

Innovate, But Not Too Seriously

Being impatient and conducting innovation projects is good. If we have the strong drive to put new solutions to the market as soon as possible.

Why innovate? Defining a Purpose of Innovation

Astonishingly, quite often it is not so clear what exactly a company wants to achieve with innovation. But why is it so important to define the exact purpose of innovation?

Self-Conception of Innovation Managers

The term Innovation Management suggests that it is innovation that needs to be managed. In reality it is people who need to be managed in order to facilitate innovation. What exactly happens here? And what is the true role of an Innovation Management unit?

BLOG
WHAT ARE COMMON CHALLENGES
WHEN INNOVATING NEW ADDED VALUES?
Here a glimpse into symptoms I've encountered over the years building innovation management systems in companies. Like always, only when understanding and working on the underlying root-causes there is a chance for cure.
February 20, 2026

Resources for Innovation

Innovating business is often communicated as strategically important. The actual allocation of resources, however, speaks a different language.

Read more

Consequent Behaviour

One of the hardest behavioural changes towards effective innovation work is acting consequently. We can set ambitious objectives, communicate processes, stage gates and tools, onboard and train people. But it all won`t help if we don`t consequently change certain aspects in our own behaviour.

Innovate, But Not Too Seriously

Being impatient and conducting innovation projects is good. If we have the strong drive to put new solutions to the market as soon as possible.

DIFFER
ENCE
HOW IS DEVELOPING NEW ADDED VALUE DIFFERENT TO DEVELOPING IMPROVEMENTS OF THE EXISTING?

Most companies do really well in continuously improving their existing offerings. This is what people in all organisational functions are trained for and excel in.
But what is so different when developing new kinds of added values?

+

UNCERTAINTY

Offering new kinds of added values ideally has high economic potential but usually bears many uncertainties. How many customers do really have the challenges we want to address with new solutions? Do they really see added value in what we offer? Are customers willing to pay for these new added values? If yes, how much? Will customers trust us to deliver these new solutions? And will they accept us in this often unfamiliar role? Do we reach our customers by the channel we choose? In the case of incremental improvements, it is usually possible to make clear assessments. When it comes to novel forms of added value, however, there is generally no past experience to draw upon.

+

SUCCESS METRICS

Success in the development of incremental improvements is usually measured using ‘design to cost’ (DTC) approaches. However, when developing novel solutions with new added-values, these metrics are not applicable. There are no cost targets yet. In most cases, we do not even know yet exactly what the solution needs to look like.
The focus here is instead on learning quickly and gathering evidence. Specifically regarding the hypotheses critical to success that underpin any development of novel value-added features. Success in this approach is measured entirely differently.

+

CUSTOMER INTERACTION

The impetus for developing incremental improvements usually comes from existing contacts at client companies. However, innovative solutions often target different groups of people, users and decision-makers. This means we have to engage with groups of people who are very different from those we usually deal with. And we have to ask questions that often feel uncomfortable at first. We even test prototypes that appear unfinished and rudimentary – ones we would normally be embarrassed to show.

+

INVOLVED FUNCTIONS

Incremental improvements to existing products are usually initiated and developed by the product development or engineering teams. However, when it comes to developing and testing innovative new value propositions, several departments are typically involved, such as product management, sales and IT. Furthermore, new solutions are often not, by their very nature, rooted in R&D or technical departments, meaning that their development does not take place there either.

UNCERTAINTY

Offering new kinds of added values ideally bring high economic potential but usually bears many uncertainties. How many customers do really have the problem we want to address with a new solution? Will customers trust us offering these new solutions, maybe in a new role? Do customers really see added value in what we offer? Are customers willing to pay for these new added values? If yes, to what price point? Do we reach our customers throuh the channel we choose? ... and many more.

+

Resources for Innovation

Innovating business is often communicated as strategically important. The actual allocation of resources, however, speaks a different language.

Innovate, But Not Too Seriously

Being impatient and conducting innovation projects is good. If we have the strong drive to put new solutions to the market as soon as possible.

The Innovation Theater

Showing best intentions to innovate while not allocating resources adequately is a way that is seen quite often.

SUCCESS METRICS

It is all about learning, not revenue. In endeavours with relevant entrepreneurial uncertainty (which is always the case with new kinds of solutions) we want to reduce uncertainty as quickly as possible. This is done by fast learning about the crucial uncertainties in our new offering.
While, in our core business we aim at keeping risks low and optimise the existing business.
Fostering both mindsets in parallel is often described with the term ambidexterity.

+

Innovate, But Not Too Seriously

Being impatient and conducting innovation projects is good. If we have the strong drive to put new solutions to the market as soon as possible.

Why innovate? Defining a Purpose of Innovation

Astonishingly, quite often it is not so clear what exactly a company wants to achieve with innovation. But why is it so important to define the exact purpose of innovation?

Self-Conception of Innovation Managers

The term Innovation Management suggests that it is innovation that needs to be managed. In reality it is people who need to be managed in order to facilitate innovation. What exactly happens here? And what is the true role of an Innovation Management unit?

"Developing new forms of added value requires people within the company to take on additional new roles, which may seem unfamiliar at first."
ROLES
THE ART OF RAISING THE CAPABILITY TO INNOVATE IS ABOUT IMPLEMENTING ROLES

It is people, not processes that make something succeed. Clear processes are needed and can be considered a very useful tool. But processes will not help a bit if people don't know (or appreciate) their role in a bigger picture.

Description of Roles

Here you find a brief description of the distinctive roles that several functions in the company have when effectively innovating business.

The C-Level`s Roles

INITIATOR - The C-level realises that the current approach in innovation will not lead to necessary results. The root-causes are identified in close consultation with the Inno Mgmt Unit. The C-Level tasks the Inno Mgmt Unit with developing and implementing an effective innovation system that is suitable to raise the company's innovation ability.

VISIONARY - The C-level has a concrete entrepreneurial vision of where the company should be heading. With this visionary guidance, the C-level sets guard rails for alls innovation activities.

ROADBUILDER - C-level executives pave the way within the company by motivating different functional areas to contribute and take the risks associated with innovation.

RELENTLESS AMBASSADOR – C-level executives use every opportunity to motivate people to get onboard and embrace the new.

The Innovation Mgmt`s roles

MASTER MIND - The Innovation Management Unit (IM) is the entity that knows what to do in order to make the company innovative. IM builds an innovation management system consisting of an End-to-End process, roles, governance and tools.

PEOPLE ENABLER - Several actors need to know exactly what to do in order to make the innovation management system work.

ROADBUILDER - C-level executives pave the way within the company by motivating different functional areas to contribute and take the risks associated with innovation.

RELENTLESS AMBASSADOR – C-level executives use every opportunity to motivate people to get onboard and embrace the new.

"While several functions within the company play an important role in innovation, it is crucial that C-Level Management and Innovation Management live their innovation-specific roles. This requires specific skills."
SKILLS
SKILLS FOR EFFECTIVE INNOVATION MANAGEMENT
C-level Manager or Division Head
+
Precisely define & anchor purpose of innovation in business context
+
Provide suitable strategic guardrails to focus innovation initiatives
+
Motivate people to engage for a desirable future and take fears caused by uncertainty
+
Practice Innovation Leadership and leadership for operative business at the same time
Innovation Manager
+
Identify underlying root-causes for the company's challenges in innovation work  
+
Being very consequent while at the same time acting as internal service provider
+
Develop and implement innovation systems that will increase the company's ability to innovate
+
Enable functions in all hierarchies to take in their roles in innovation

Critical Skills

The Purpose of Innovation

Living roles means that certain skills are present. Here you find descriptions of some of the skills that are critical to effectively conduct innovation work, especially a bit off the core business in a company.

Investing resources shall only happen when it is very clear how the investment is supposed help the companies success. Just as with any other investment this applies to innovation initiatives too.
Shall innovative new solutions enable the entry into a new market? Or stabilise current market shares? Or generate additional revenues with new offerings?
If yes, in what scale shall new solutions contribute?

Providing Guard Rails

Any innovation activity should be very focused and reasoned to improve efficiency and to avoid frustration of colleagues. How do you focus innovaton activities? First of all, by aligning them to a desirable future state of you customers as well as your company. We call this a Picture of the Future. A vision of what be believe a desirable future for customers could look like in 5 yrs from now amid anticipated developments and trends in our customers business world. And a vision of which role our compnay should play in facilitating this desirable future of our customers. Important: We don`t rely on what our customers tell us what they want. This could be way too short-sighted. Actually we must take in our customers`perspective make up our own mind how the future could be bright being confronted with often drastic anticipated developments in market structures, perceived added values, competition, technologies, regulations.

SKILLS
SKILLS FOR EFFECTIVE INNOVATION MANAGEMENT
C-level Manager or Division Head
+
Precisely define purpose of innovation in business context
+
Provide suitable guardrails to guide innovation initiatives
+
Motivate people to engage for a desirable future and take fears caused by uncertainty
+
Practice Innovation Leadership and leadership for operative business at the same time
Innovation Manager
Identify underlying root-causes of the company`s challenges in innovation work
+
+
Develop and implement an innovation system that will increase the company's ability to innovate
Enable people in all hierarchies to take in their roles in innovation
+
+
Being very consequent while at the same time acting as internal service provider
ASSESS
MENT
ASSESSING AN ORGANISATION`S CAPABILITY FOR INNOVATION
Here are some indicators that can give you a first picture about your organisation's capability to innovate business:

Not every idea will lead to business success. Usually several ideas need to be explored to get evidence for a business opportunity.
Selfspeaking we should be as quick as possible exploring one idea after another to eventually hit bull`s eye. Time from idea to business evidence is therefore crucial to have an advantage over competitors.

What time range are we talking about here? From a prioritized idea in an idea portfolio, over setting up and innovation sprint team with appx. 2 days per week of time, over running a business model sprint with lean experiments = 3-4 months. A methodologically experienced sprint team will generate strong evidence for or against the idea based on customer investment.

Innovation work needs an idea what a desirable future for a certain customer group could look like and what role we want to take in to facilitate this desirable future for our customers (it does not matter internal or external customers). How could we decide what's in scope or out of scope for us if we don`t have any idea who we as company want to be?

Are you expecting 5 million of new revenues in 2 yrs from now, starting from scratch a new business model? And you appoint 2 working students to facilitate this every Friday afternoon? Hopefully not.

How long does it take us to get from a prioritised idea to sufficient evidence to follow the idea further or leave it?
To what extend is our vision and our strategy built uppon our customers?
How long does it take us to get from an prioritised idea to sufficient evidence to follow the idea further or leave it?
How much time (FTE, manpower) do we invest in innovation in relation to what we expect as outcome?
We have many good ideas for product improvements. But do we have ideas else than improving the already existing?
We have a sophisticated innovation process in place. Do we follow it?
Does our vision and strategy allow us to focus our innovation efforts?
How often per month / year does the innovation management unit speak with the C-Level about innovation topics?
ASSESS
MENT
ASSESSING AN ORGANISATION`S CAPABILITY FOR INNOVATION
Here are some indicators that can give you a first hint about your organisation's capability to innovate business:
How long does it take us to get from an prioritised idea to sufficient evidence to follow the idea further or leave it?
Does our vision and strategy allow us to focus our innovation efforts?
We have many good ideas for product improvements. But do we have ideas else than improving the already existing?
How much time (FTE, manpower) do we invest in innovation in relation to what we expect as outcome?
To what extend is our vision and our strategy built uppon our customers?
How often per month / year does the innovation management unit speak with the C-Level about innovation topics?
VOICES